Analysis: Artists Analyses

While reading everyone's artist analyses, I found myself much more interested than I would have expected to be. Though, generally, the same concepts found their way into each critique, each of my classmates was able to give me a little more insight, and express ideas that I could not quite imagine on my own. Here are some of my favorite descriptions of each artist, as worded by my classmates:

Wall: "interesting lighting," "everyday life," "subtle," "philosophical," "lyrical"

Hocks - "interesting process," "whimsical," "interesting subject matter," "surreal," "off-beat," "curious," "dream-like"

Crewdson - "dark," "vacant," "dreary," "powerful," "deep tones," "unique," "cinematic," "painstakingly intricate," "mysterious," "haunting"

Sherman - "appealing," "vintage," "innocent yet devious," "eerie type of glamour," "classic," "feminine beauty"

Thank you, class, for your interesting analyses! I was pleasantly surprised.